Editing
UDP Protocol
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== 2. Use Cases Where UDP is Preferred == UDP is ideal in scenarios where: * Speed is more important than reliability * The application can handle occasional data loss * Low latency is critical {| class="wikitable" ! Example Use Case !! Protocol / Port !! Why UDP is Suitable |- | Domain name lookups || DNS / 53 || Fast, small queries with retry logic handled by client |- | Voice calls || SIP / 5060, RTP || Prioritizes real-time delivery over perfect reliability |- | Live video || RTSP, custom UDP streams || Skipping frames is better than stalling |- | Online gaming || Varies || Low latency is more important than perfect accuracy |- | Time synchronization || NTP / 123 || Delays are more harmful than packet loss |- | Lightweight monitoring || SNMP / 161 || Periodic data, not mission-critical |- | Bootstrapping devices || TFTP / 69 || Simple protocol for controlled environments |}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to HackOps may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
HackOps:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information